First They Came For the O'Reilly's: The Danger of Politicized Detective Shows

http://www.rightsidenews.com/200912127729/culture-wars/first-they-came-for-the-oreillys-the-danger-of-politicized-detective-shows.html

The Right Conservative News Sites | Right Side News
Saturday
Dec 19th
First They Came For the O'Reilly's: The Danger of Politicized Detective Shows Print E-mail
Written by Barry Rubin
Saturday, 12 December 2009 02:21


One of the shocking and upsetting things nowadays is the politicization of fictional entertainment showsm, another example of the incredibly dangerous polarization of America today.

Consider this story. Fox News' Bill O'Reilly is angry over how he is characterized on a TV show called "Law and Order: Special Victims Unit." After reading what happened I don't blame him one bit. People across the political spectrum should be equally angry. This is not a liberal-conservative issue but one of fundamental importance to everyone.

According to an article, the show is about a crazed anti-immigration activist who murders the children of illegal immigrants. In one scene, a character, defending the murderer says, "Limbaugh, Beck, O'Reilly, all of 'em, they are like a cancer spreading ignorance and hate...They've convinced folks that immigrants are the problem, not corporations that fail to pay a living wage or a broken health care system...."

It seems the character is saying that the poor murderer is just a dupe who has been pushed over the edge by this evil trio. Since they have never advocated murdering immigrants or their children I assume this dialogue was maliciously written to defame them, damage them professionally, reduce their income, and could potentially bring violence against them. In short, they have been slandered (that's a moral, not a legal opinion). Incidentally, isn't the first sentence almost word for word a repetition of what a White House official charged? Coincidence?

Second, this show's plot is a Politically Correct lie, not anything based on fact. There have been no crazed anti-immigration activist murdering children of illegal immigrants, but illegal immigrants have committed a lot of crimes. Will a TV entertainment show have that as a plot? I assume no (perhaps I'm wrong) because the producers and writers of television shows believe this would make people anti-illegal immigrant.

In other words, the creators of the show aren't against creating ignorance and hate, they just claim the right to determine who the victims are going to be. Moreover, they can say that this is only a character speaking not necessarily the opinions of, etc., etc. But does anyone doubt that character is just a ventriloquist's dummy?

Does this mean it isn't legitimate to discuss whether illegal immigration is a problem, just as we can't talk about the Islamist motivations of Khalid Hasan, the Fort Hood murderer, because presumably this will set off an anti-Muslim pogrom? Is it incitement to murder to point out that large numbers of illegal immigrants take jobs away and lower wages for U.S. citizens, and that they could overwhelm the healthcare system in certain states? Isn't that precisely why there are laws to control immigration which is what makes these immigrants illegal? Or is that, too, incitement to murder?The permissible bounds of debate are being narrowed in myriad ways.

This situation reminds me of the British television drama a few months back which showed crazed Christian fundamentalists decapitating Muslims. This never happened but the opposite has. If you want to shut up about certain things do so, but don't make up total lies in the exact opposite direction, pretending that TV commentators are calling for lynch mobs and pious Christians are cutting people's heads off.

Indeed, this show might well inspire violence against these three radio and tv personalities. How would people of other views feel if entertainment shows used their names and falsely attributed to them responsibility for brutal crimes that never happened based on things they never said? How about a crazed environmenal activist murdering people and the crime being attributed to Al Gore who were are then told is spreading hatred of, say, lumber companies or power plants?

Finally, what gives with the speech's anti-capitalism message. Living out in Hollywood, guess such people have never heard about the minimum wage law while sitting around the swimming pool. As for the editorial presumably intended to endorse the Obama Administration's health bill, are detective shows now lobbying for legislation?

Of course, if two opinions were provided, one on each side, at least the program-makers could claim they did it for dramatic purposes. But this is pure propaganda.

Why is this of any importance? Because as I've just pointed out (see here) people are already being told that there is only one right way to think and that the alternative view is disgusting, immoral, and even criminal. To add such explicit messages into TV drama shows adds another institution to this closing down of freedom to debate and dissent.

There is another problem here, too, the growing tendency--on both sides--not to answer people with reasoned arguments or facts any more but just to denounce them along the lines of, to paraphrase an old Southern saying, they are too mean to live.

Aside from being just plain wrong from the standpoint of a free society, there is always the danger that this kind of thing could be turned against other people in future. "Progressives" are too full of hubris to see this. When it comes to arrogance, snobbishness, and greed nowadays, no big business can compare to Hollywood and the TV industry class. They can't imagine a situation in which they aren't the cultural elite, above criticism.

Clearly, their memory of the McCarthy era hasn't made them empathetic. Even in those years, I don't think Sergeant Joe Friday in "Dragnet" would have named specific people, calling them Commies urging people toward crimes.

To paraphrase Martin Niemoller's famous poem, First they came for the O'Reilly's....

The poem actually begins, "First they came for the Jews," which--given current conventions--"they" would say didn't apply because they are claiming to only be coming to get "the Zionists."

For those who haven't reread it recently, here's Niemollers poem:

"First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me."

------------------------------
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Trackback(0)
trackbackTrackBack URI for this entry
Comments (0)Add Comment
feedSubscribe to this comment's feed

Write comment
Name
Email
Website
Title
Comment
bold italicize underline strike url image quote Smile Wink Laugh Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Tongue Kiss Cry
smaller | bigger
Subscribe via email (registered users only)
I have read and agree to the Terms of Usage.
Add Comment

busy

Login Form
Username

Password
Remember Me
Forgot your password?
Create an account

* Latest News
o No Racism Here
o Second Grader Forced by School Officials to Undergo Psych Evaluation for Drawing Crucified Jesus
o Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Case Against Gun Maker
o Radical Feminism's Attack on Manhood in America
* Popular
o My Mother's Birth Certificate - And Obama's
o Burning Down The House: What Caused Our Economic Crisis?
o Obama's Birth Certificate - Still Missing
o State Of Hawaii Backs Andy Martin In Obama Birth Certificate Battle

* No Racism Here
* Second Grader Forced by School Officials to Undergo Psych Evaluation for Drawing Crucified Jesus
* Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Case Against Gun Maker
* Radical Feminism's Attack on Manhood in America

Right Side News Survey

TakeOurSurvey
twitter_logo_125x29
find_us_on_facebook_badge

Subscribe to our Weekly Newsletter
First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Zip Code:


rsn_betrayal_175
About UsLinks
rsn_cultureofdeath_250
rightsidenews_01


rightsidenews_301
braille exit signs
exit signs

Home | Homeland Security | Border & Sovereignty | Politics and Economics | Global Terrorism | Energy & Environment | Culture Wars | Editorial
Copyright © 2009 Right Side Publications, LLC - Site Map - Site developed by BCS - Privacy Policy
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter